The (Gross) Anatomy of Responding to Peer Review Commentary

No Reviews - Be the first

CE Credit: 1.25

Length: 1 hour 15 minutes

Publishing academic work often involves submitting scholarly manuscripts to peer-reviewed journals. A key component of the publishing process involves receiving commentary about your work from peers in your field, and satisfactorily responding to such commentary. Despite it being a core feature of the publishing process, researchers rarely receive formal training on responding to peer review commentary. This workshop describes evidence-based strategies for responding to peer review commentary, including strategies for how to compose cover letters for responding to such commentary.

Learning Objective
Identify evidence-based strategies for responding to commentary from peer-reviewed evaluations of your academic work.

Presenter: Andres De Los Reyes, PhD

De Los Reyes Dr. Andres De Los Reyes is an Associate Professor of Psychology and Director of Clinical Training at the University of Maryland at College Park. He serves as Director of the Comprehensive Assessment and Intervention Program (CAIP), a laboratory that seeks to understand the inconsistent outcomes that commonly arise from multi-informant assessments of child and adolescent mental health. His publications have appeared in such journals as the Psychological BulletinPsychological ReviewPsychological Assessment, and the Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. He is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (JCCAP), and Founding Program Chair of JCCAP's Future Directions Forum.

Register for other webcasts in this series:

Supplementary Materials

  • Supplemental Materials
  • Slides PDF